ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the therapeutic effect and molecular mechanism of Methods: Phytochemical profiles of the methanol extract BYJ were analyzed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-Q-TOF-MS), while network pharmacology and molecular docking were employed to predict the core active components and therapeutic targets. For experimental validation, a CKD mouse model was established via adenine induction. Mice were randomly assigned to normal control, model, and three BYJ treatment groups (low-dose: 2 g/kg·d, middle-dose: 4 g/kg·d, and high-dose: 8 g/kg·d, crude drug equivalent). Assessments included renal function parameters, histopathological changes, inflammatory markers, and oxidative stress indicators. The associated molecular mechanisms were analyzed using immunohistochemistry staining and Western blot. Results: In silico analysis identified five core targets-PIK3R1, AKT1, SRC, MTOR, and EGFR-and suggested esculetin as a key active component with strong binding affinity to these targets. Experimentally, BYJ administration significantly reduced in serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and the kidney index, and ameliorated glomerular atrophy and tubular dilation. Furthermore, BYJ treatment downregulated pro-inflammatory factors (eg, IL-1β), elevated superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) content. The intervention suppressed the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) process, as evidenced by the upregulation of E-cadherin and downregulation of α-SMA expression. Mechanistic verification indicated that BYJ treatment was associated with attenuated the overactivated of TGF-β/PI3K-AKT/mTOR pathway in renal tissues. Conclusion: The methanolic extract of BYJ effectively attenuates CKD progression in mice, which is associated with by modulated the overactivation of the TGF-β/PI3K-AKT/mTOR pathway, inhibited the EMT process, and ameliorated inflammatory response and oxidative stress. These findings provide a preliminary theoretical basis for the development of BYJ as a potential candidate agent for CKD treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.