ReviewExtracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids2026
Quantification of EV-associated miRNA in liquid biopsies for biomarker signature development.
Review in Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Extracellular vesicle (EV)-associated microRNAs (miRNAs) are promising minimally invasive biomarkers, as EV encapsulation protects miRNAs from degradation while preserving disease- and cell- type-specific expression patterns across diverse human body fluids. This review summarizes the current understanding of miRNA and EV biogenesis, including the mechanisms governing EV cargo packaging. We further discuss the broad range of EV sources used in liquid biopsy and molecular diagnostics, including blood, urine, saliva, milk, respiratory fluids, and cerebrospinal fluid, highlighting both the diagnostic utility and key pre-analytical challenges associated with EV-miRNA analysis. State-of-the-art EV isolation approaches, including differential ultracentrifugation, size-exclusion chromatography, affinity-based methods, microfluidic platforms, flow cytometry and nanoparticle-based analyses are not isolation methods and are therefore excluded from this comparison. In addition, workflows for EV-associated RNA extraction and quantification, including RNA sequencing and reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction-based methodologies, are critically evaluated. Emphasis is placed on challenges related to data quality assessment, normalization strategies, low-input sample analysis, and high sample heterogeneity. This review also summarizes current standardization initiatives, including MISEV, MIQE, EV-TRACK, and EV Task Force biofluid guidelines, emphasizing the importance of rigorous reporting standards, harmonized pre-analytical workflows, and multiparametric normalization strategies for reproducible detection and accurate quantification. Finally, we discuss emerging best practices and unresolved challenges in multivariate modeling, miRNA isoform-based analyses, and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.