Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454291›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2026

Dietary exposure to food additives in ultra-processed foods: implications for gut microbiome, metabolic health, and risk assessment.

Corina Dalia Toderescu, Elena Narcisa Pogurschi, Alina Stefanache, Melania Florina Munteanu, Svetlana Trifunschi, Alexandru Oancea, Meda-Ada Bugi, Iulia Cresneac

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Corina Dalia ToderescuFaculty of Pharmacy, "Vasile Goldis" Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania.
Elena Narcisa PogurschiFaculty of Animal Productions Engineering and Management, University of Agronomic Sciences and Veterinary Medicine, Bucharest, Romania.
Alina StefanacheFaculty of Pharmacy, Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Iasi, Romania.
Melania Florina MunteanuFaculty of Pharmacy, "Vasile Goldis" Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania.
Svetlana TrifunschiFaculty of Pharmacy, "Vasile Goldis" Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania.
Alexandru OanceaFaculty of Pharmacy, "Vasile Goldis" Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania.
Meda-Ada BugiFaculty of Pharmacy, "Vasile Goldis" Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania.
Iulia CresneacFaculty of Pharmacy, "Vasile Goldis" Western University of Arad, Arad, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The increasing consumption of ultra-processed foods has led to a substantial rise in dietary exposure to food additives, making them a consistent component of modern dietary patterns. While food additives are generally considered safe within established regulatory limits, their long-term health effects remain a subject of growing scientific interest, particularly from a nutritional epidemiology perspective. Methods: This narrative review, conducted following PRISMA-informed principles, synthesizes recent experimental, clinical, and epidemiological evidence on the health effects of major food additive categories, including emulsifiers, non-nutritive sweeteners, preservatives, and synthetic colorants. Literature searches were performed in Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed, covering studies published between 2010 and 2024. A qualitative assessment of study quality was performed based on study design, sample size, and potential sources of bias. The results of this assessment are summarized in Table 2. Results: Dietary exposure to food additives through ultra-processed foods has been associated with changes in the gut microbiome, metabolic function, and low-grade inflammation. Experimental studies consistently report biological effects, particularly for emulsifiers and artificial sweeteners, whereas epidemiological findings remain heterogeneous and influenced by overall dietary patterns. Conclusion: Current evidence supports the need to evaluate food additives within the context of dietary patterns rather than as isolated compounds. While most approved additives remain safe at regulated intake levels, emerging data suggest that cumulative exposure and diet-microbiome interactions may not be fully captured by existing risk assessment frameworks. Integrating nutritional context into future safety evaluations may improve their relevance for public health.

Indexed as

Dietary ExposureFast FoodsFood AdditivesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansRisk AssessmentFood Additivesartificial sweetenersdietary exposuredietary patternsemulsifiersfood additivesgut microbiomemetabolic healthultra-processed foods

Identifiers

PMID42454291
PMCPMC13364841

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.