Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42454338›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T water2026

Improving Inference from Reported Concentrations in Environmental Surveillance by Modeling the Statistical Features of Digital PCR.

Adrian Lison, Timothy R Julian, Tanja Stadler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T water, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adrian LisonDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel 4056, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6822-8437
Timothy R JulianSwiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Eawag, Dubendorf 8600, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1000-0306
Tanja StadlerDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Basel 4056, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital polymerase chain reaction (dPCR) is a powerful technique for quantifying gene targets in environmental samples, with applications ranging from species monitoring to wastewater-based epidemiology. Although accurate statistical models for analyzing dPCR measurements exist, these require exact assay parameters and the number of positive and total PCR partitions. In practice, however, many environmental studies and monitoring programs analyze only concentration estimates, assuming normally or log-normally distributed measurements. Such assumptions ignore key statistical features of PCR assays, including concentration-dependent measurement noise and nondetects, leading to biased environmental estimates. In this work, we present a Bayesian model with a dPCR-specific likelihood that can be fitted directly to reported concentrations, while incorporating uncertainty in assay parameters through interpretable priors. Using real-world case studies of free-eDNA decay in seawater and pathogen transmission from wastewater, we show that our approach yields similar estimates as a fully informed model with partition counts, while avoiding biases from normal or log-normal approximations. This enables accurate inference from dPCR measurements even when partition count data and assay parameters are unavailable. The method is implemented in the R packages "dPCRfit" for regression analyses and "EpiSewer" for wastewater surveillance.

Indexed as

dPCReDNAlimit of detectionlimit of quantificationwastewater-based epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID42454338
PMCPMC13366574

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.