ReviewMolecular biomedicine2026
Cardiac regeneration and repair: the emerging mechanisms and therapeutic approaches.
Review in Molecular biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Myocardial infarction, characterized by irreversible cardiomyocyte loss, progressive cardiac fibrosis and subsequent deteriorated heart function, constitute an intractable global health burden. Promoting endogenous cardiomyocyte proliferation to achieve functional cardiac regeneration represents an available foreground for combatting heart failure. Based on extensive preclinical evidence, researchers have characterized the cellular and molecular mechanisms governing cardiomyocyte proliferation and elucidated the modulatory influence of the metabolic factors and extracellular matrix. Insights from various studies have facilitated the development of regenerative approaches that reprogramming terminally differentiated cardiomyocytes toward a more metabolic plastic and fetal-like state, thereby enhancing the proliferative and reparative potential. Integration of metabolic and mechanical signals has emerged as a critical determinant of successful cardiomyocyte reactivation, providing a mechanistic rationale for combinatorial therapeutic strategies. Nevertheless, despite remarkable progression in mechanistic understanding and proof-of-concept studies, cardiac regeneration protocols advanced to robust clinical validation or pharmacal application have yet to be developed. This review provides a historical and biologically grounded synthesis of preclinical advances in cardiac repair, regeneration and cardiomyocyte reprogramming, with particular emphasis on translational feasibility and clinical applicability. Current strategies and preclinical trial outcomes are summarized to construct a readiness framework that maps the developmental maturity of each approach. Finally, the review highlights existing biological and technical barriers, as well as emerging opportunities poised to shape the future of cardiac regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.