ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Circadian phenotype is associated with diurnal variation in human exercise performance.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTime-of-day variation in exercise performance is well established, but the contribution of circadian phenotype to the magnitude of these differences remains unclear. This study examined diurnal variation in aerobic exercise performance and determined whether chronotype and sleep timing were associated with morning-evening differences in performance.
methodsTwenty-four healthy young adults (12 male, 12 female) completed a randomised crossover protocol consisting of a 10-min cycling time trial performed in the morning (08:00-09:00) and evening (17:00-18:00). Pre-trial sleep, diet, and physical activity were standardised, and circadian phenotype was characterised using the Composite Morningness Questionnaire and 7-day actigraphy.
resultsMean power, peak power, and distance covered were all significantly higher in the evening compared with morning (p < 0.01). Chronotype (r = - 0.47, p = 0.019) and sleep midpoint (r = 0.52, p = 0.003) were significantly associated with the magnitude of the diurnal performance difference, accounting for 22% and 27% of the variance, respectively. Heart rate, blood lactate, and perceived exertion responses were similar between conditions, indicating comparable physiological strain. Core temperature was higher in the evening (p = 0.026), but did not explain performance differences.
conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that endurance exercise performance is enhanced in the evening compared with the morning and suggest that behavioural markers of circadian phenotype are associated with the magnitude of diurnal variation in performance. Time-of-day and circadian phenotype should therefore be considered when optimising exercise testing and prescription.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42455307What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.