Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42455390›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026

Epigenetic Control of Mammalian Cardiomyocyte Proliferation.

Francesca Butera, David A Elliott, Enzo R Porrello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesca ButeraMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia. frankie.butera@mcri.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6606-4678
David A ElliottMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Enzo R PorrelloMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewPostnatal shutdown of the mammalian cardiomyocyte cell cycle underpins limited regenerative capacity of the adult heart. An epigenetic programme regulates a switch at birth from a proliferative state to functional maturity. Identification of the molecular components regulating this switch has revealed therapeutic opportunities for heart regeneration that have started entering the clinic. RECENT

findingsGenome-wide analyses reveal that histone modifications and DNA methylation remodel chromatin in adult cardiomyocytes, downregulating cell cycle activation genes while upregulating maturation genes. Epigenetic regulation of upstream transcriptional pathways (e.g. YAP, WNT and Notch) prevents cell cycle activation in the adult heart. Upregulating glycolysis or suppressing oxidative metabolism enhances cardiac repair following injury, with hypoxia demonstrating safety in humans. Gene therapy techniques enabling myocardial targeting have enhanced the translation of cardiac regenerative therapies, with YAP upregulation paving the way for future trials. The cardiomyocyte cell cycle is regulated by CDKs/cyclins controlled by transcriptional networks that are epigenetically suppressed in the postnatal period. Adult cardiomyocytes also harbour structural barriers and a metabolic state preventing proliferation. Pharmacological and genetic manipulation of these mechanisms can re-activate adult cardiomyocyte proliferation. However, regenerative therapies are challenged by the intrinsic link between proliferation and epigenetics, metabolism, and ultimately cardiac function.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationEpigenesis, GeneticMyocytes, CardiacRegenerationAnimalsCell CycleDNA MethylationHumansCardiomyocyteCell cycleEpigeneticsMaturationMetabolismRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID42455390
PMCPMC13372851

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.