SynthesisReproduction & fertility2026
The genetics of primary dysmenorrhoea: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Reproduction & fertility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractDysmenorrhoea is the most common gynaecological condition in women of reproductive age. Approximately 90% of cases are primary dysmenorrhoea (PDM), which is not associated with an underlying pathology. Dysmenorrhoea can have a substantial impact on quality of life, yet current therapies do not provide adequate relief to everyone. Family history (FHx) is a known risk factor that suggests genetic involvement. We therefore aimed to synthesise the literature describing the genetics of PDM. Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science) were searched for studies published up to November 2025. Key search terms included 'dysmenorrhea', 'polymorphism' and 'SNP'. Articles were screened independently by two researchers, and data were extracted and presented in a narrative format. Quality assessment was conducted using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and STREGA guidelines. Fifteen articles were included in the review (n = 7 case-control; n = 4 cross-sectional; and n = 4 genome-wide association studies (GWASs)). Candidate gene studies identified seven polymorphisms and two combined genotypes that were associated with PDM. One significant positive association was replicated in two studies (ESR1 PvuII). GWASs highlighted loci near the NGF, ZMIZ1, IL1A and IL1B genes. The NGF and IL1 loci support what is known about the involvement of inflammatory pathways in PDM pathogenesis. However, they are also known endometriosis loci. The current literature is limited by a lack of adequate secondary dysmenorrhoea case exclusion, limited ethnic populations and low quality. Further research in multiple ancestries is essential to increase generalisability, while thorough diagnostic protocols will reduce misclassification, improve understanding of PDM pathogenesis and thus help inform new treatment development. LAY SUMMARY: Period pain is extremely common in menstruating women and has a major impact on their lives, yet we still do not have a full understanding of its biological causes or how to treat all women effectively. Research shows that period pain can run in families; therefore, we conducted this review to highlight which genes appear to be related to period pain (specifically period pain that is not caused by an existing condition, such as endometriosis or fibroids). After searching three academic databases, we found 15 studies that met our criteria. Three genes were highlighted across two or more studies; these genes are known to be involved in pain processing and how the body deals with immune responses and oestrogen (a female hormone). From this review, we know that we need more research on this topic as there are still likely to be more genes involved in period pain and these might vary in different ethnic populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.