Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42457218›Full record

ReviewRMD open2026

Expert viewpoint on endpoints in systemic sclerosis: current and future outlook.

Anna-Maria Hoffmann-Vold, Oliver Distler, Francesco Del Galdo, Jörg Hw Distler, Yannick Allanore, Elana J Bernstein, Christopher P Denton, Masataka Kuwana, Marco Matucci-Cerinic, Margarida Alves and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RMD open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Anna-Maria Hoffmann-VoldDepartment of Rheumatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6467-7422
Oliver DistlerDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0546-8310
Francesco Del GaldoLeeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds and Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospital Trusts, Leeds, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8528-2283
Jörg Hw DistlerDepartment of Rheumatology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Yannick AllanoreDepartment of Rheumatology, Cochin Hospital, Université Paris Cité, INSERM U1016, Paris, France.
Elana J BernsteinDivision of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-6390
Christopher P DentonDivision of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Masataka KuwanaDepartment of Allergy and Rheumatology, Nippon Medical School Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8352-6136
Marco Matucci-CerinicUnit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Diseases (UnIRAR), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9324-3161
Margarida AlvesTA Inflammation Med, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Ingelheim am Rhein, Germany.
Vanessa SmithDepartment of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium vanessa.smith@ugent.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6271-7945

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, heterogeneous, systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease characterised by vasculopathy, immune dysregulation and fibrosis affecting multiple organ systems. The complexity and variability of SSc manifestations pose significant challenges for clinical trial design and endpoint selection. Historically, three types of trial concepts have emerged: studies focused on a single organ; studies suggesting disease modification by combining a primary single-organ endpoint with supportive secondary endpoints across other systems, and studies explicitly designed to demonstrate disease modification through combined endpoints.This expert review explores the current landscape and future directions of clinical endpoints in SSc trials. It highlights the growing importance of patient-reported outcomes, such as the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index and ScleroID, which provide valuable insights into patient experiences. The review also discusses the emergence of candidate composite endpoints, including the revised Composite Response Index in Systemic Sclerosis, which integrates clinical, functional and patient-centred measures to better reflect treatment efficacy.Despite progress, significant unmet needs remain. Many endpoints assess damage at advanced stages, underscoring the need for earlier indicators of disease progression. The review advocates for incorporating time-to-event analyses, imaging and biomarker-based assessments to enhance sensitivity and relevance. It also emphasises the importance of refining composite endpoints to include continuous measures and broader domains such as vascular and gastrointestinal involvement. These efforts aim to improve the design and interpretability of SSc clinical trials, ultimately enhancing therapeutic development and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Scleroderma, SystemicBiomarkersClinical Trials as TopicDisease ProgressionEndpoint DeterminationHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersBiomarkersClinical TrialHealth-Related Quality Of LifePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresScleroderma, Systemic

Identifiers

PMID42457218
PMCPMC13374462

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.