ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2026
Contribution of Consumer Products to Emerging Chemical Exposures in a Preconception Cohort Study.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the United States (U.S.), 15% of couples attempting pregnancy experience infertility, and 20% of pregnancies end in miscarriage. Environmental chemical exposures, particularly endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) from consumer products, may contribute to reproductive health challenges. We mailed wearable passive samplers (Fresh Air wristbands) to 132 female participants across 39 U.S. states and 24 of their male partners in the Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO) to characterize exposure among couples trying to conceive between January and October 2021. Wristbands were analyzed using thermal desorption gas chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry with targeted and nontargeted approaches. Nontargeted analysis revealed exposure to 491 chemicals, predominantly benzenoids (36.9%) and organoheterocyclic compounds (18.3%). Health hazard assessment identified 107 high-risk EDCs and 47 compounds predicted to have medium-to-high impacts on reproductive outcomes, including galaxolide, salicylates, and phthalates. Targeted analysis quantified 43 chemicals, revealing universal exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and phthalates. Lifestyle factors influenced exposures: frequent sunscreen users had up to 3.1 times higher ultraviolet filter exposures, while dog owners had 1.2-2.6 times higher exposure to fragrance compounds. Among cohabitating couples, few similarities were observed, despite shared environments. The findings demonstrate that consumer products contribute to complex exposure mixtures with reproductive health implications during preconception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.