ArticleBMC genomics2026
Identifying sex-specific genetic effects across 733 traits in UK biobank.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Methods Utilizing Sex-Specific PRSs Derived From GWAS Summary Statistics.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sex-specificity has been reported in a wide range of diseases and complex traits. While sex-specific genetic effects have been documented for certain traits, the genetic mechanisms underlying sex differences in most traits remain largely unexplored. With its large sample size and wide range of diseases and traits, the UK Biobank-a large, prospective cohort study containing health history, phenotypic measurements, and genetic data for over 500,000 individuals-provides an opportunity to explore sexually dimorphic genetic architectures in a large number of traits and diseases. Here, we present a sex-specific analysis of 733 sex-stratified complex trait GWAS for 361,194 white British individuals in the UK Biobank. Among these 733 traits, we detected sex-specific locus in 520 of them. These 520 candidate traits with sex-specific genetic effects were classified to 270 distinct groups. Using a systematic sex-specific discovery-replication analysis, we identify 489 loci showing sex-specific effects on 127 of the candidate trait groups, among which three of them having the most numbers of traits showing replicable signals were further investigated, including fat mass related traits (12 traits), heart disease related traits (7 traits) and body impedance related traits (6 traits). We identify pathways with sex-biased enrichment patterns from exploratory enrichment analyses based on QTL-associated genes. In addition, we present further evidence for significant sex-specific genetic effects in 25 traits by comparing the prediction performance of sex-specific polygenic risk scores (PRS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.