Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42458684›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2026

Provider-Prescribed Restrictive Diets in Patients With Eating Disorders Presenting for Gastroenterology Care.

Armand Amini, Mia Dekel, Mariana N Almeida, Micaela Atkins, Isabelle Garcia-Fisher, Elizabeth N Madva, Helen Burton-Murray, Kyle Staller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Armand AminiCenter for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5070-5266
Mia DekelCenter for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0836-6441
Mariana N AlmeidaCenter for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Micaela AtkinsCenter for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-4594
Isabelle Garcia-FisherCenter for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9531-4967
Elizabeth N MadvaCenter for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2194-2032
Helen Burton-MurrayCenter for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2059-3256
Kyle StallerCenter for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4925-4290

Funding

A Biobehavioral Approach to Understand Problematic Avoidant/Restrictive Eating in Adults with Functional DyspepsiaK23DK131334 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BURTON MURRAY, HELEN · 2021 to 2025
$1.1M
A Positive Psychology Intervention for Irritable Bowel SyndromeK23DK138875 · NIDDK · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Elizabeth Noble Madva · 2025 to 2026
$394k
NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK131334NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK138875
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDespite considerable evidence and patient demand, restrictive diets for gastrointestinal (GI) disorders may be harmful in those with comorbid eating disorders (EDs). We identified the frequency and characteristics of provider-recommended restrictive diets among those with EDs seeking GI care.

methodsUsing a preexisting cohort of patients who had a GI encounter from 2010 to 2020 with a GI diagnosis and ED diagnosis (either diagnosed before or after initial GI encounter), we conducted a retrospective analysis of restrictive diet prescriptions within 12 months of initial GI consult as well as diet type, provider subspecialty, and types of ED and GI diagnoses.

resultsFrom a cohort of 610 patients, we found 285 patients meeting our inclusion criteria; 50 (17.5%) were prescribed restrictive diets within 12 months of their GI consult by GI providers. Disorders of gut-brain interaction were the most common GI diagnoses overall (n = 169, 59.3%). Of those with a pre-existing ED (n = 188), 30 (16.0%) were prescribed a restrictive diet, and of those with a subsequently diagnosed ED (n = 97), 20 (20.6%) were prescribed a restrictive diet. Among patients with preexisting EDs, 69 (36.7%) were not in remission at the time of consultation. Of those with preexisting EDs who were prescribed a restrictive diet, 17/30 (57.7%) were not in remission.

conclusionWe found that 16% of patients with an ED history were prescribed a restrictive diet by their gastroenterologist, including those not in remission. Further research is needed on the potential risk of restrictive diets in facilitating ED behavior.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersGastrointestinal DiseasesAdultFemaleGastroenterologyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studiesepidemiologyexclusion dietsFODMAPgastrointestinal disordersIBSirritable bowel syndromeretrospective cohort study

Identifiers

PMID42458684
PMCPMC13373245

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.