SynthesisHematological oncology2026
Real-World Luspatercept Evidence in Myelodysplastic Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Hematological oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Luspatercept has emerged as a therapeutic option for patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS). Nonetheless, the performance of luspatercept outside of controlled clinical trials remains unclear. We aimed to synthesize real-world evidence (RWE) on the effectiveness and safety of luspatercept. This study was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. We searched for studies up to June 2025 evaluating luspatercept in adult MDS patients. Data on hematologic improvement-erythroid (HI-E), transfusion independence (TI at 8, 12, and 16 weeks), adverse events, and overall survival (OS) were extracted. Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses were performed using priors derived from pooled clinical trials. Seventeen studies were included: five clinical trials (440 patients) and twelve real-world cohorts (1821 patients). The pooled estimate for HI-E was 46.6% (95% CrI: 32.5%-63.9%). For TI, pooled rates at 8, 12, and 16 weeks were 44.7% (95% CrI: 28.6%-61.5%), 38.6% (95% CrI: 21.1%-60.0%), and 30.9% (95% CrI: 10.7%-53.9%), respectively. The subgroups with highest TI and HI-E were patients with positive SF3B1 status (58.5%, at 8 weeks) and Asian patients (54.8%), respectively. Male sex was associated with lower HI-E, 8, and 12 weeks TI rates. Hypertension and falls were more frequently reported in RWE. We estimated OS rates of 88.9% at 1 year and 74.4% at 2 years following treatment initiation. Real-world HI-E were modestly attenuated, likely reflecting selection, adherence, and monitoring differences. The response seems dependent on disease, geographical, and demographical moderators. Such aspects should be taken into account in the design of future studies and in clinical decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.