ReviewThe Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology2026
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in the Management of Dermal Filler-Induced Vascular Occlusion: A Scoping Review.
Review in The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been used in ischemic and inflammatory conditions due to its ability to enhance tissue oxygenation and support wound healing. Filler-induced vascular occlusion (FIVO) is a rare but potentially devastating complication of dermal filler injections that may result in skin necrosis or vision loss. HBOT has been increasingly reported as an adjunctive intervention in FIVO, but its reported use has not been systematically summarized.
objectiveTo summarize the existing literature on HBOT use in FIVO, describe reported clinical contexts and treatment parameters, and identify gaps in current knowledge.
methodsThis scoping review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. A comprehensive search of PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar identified case reports, case series, experimental studies, and reviews describing FIVO cases managed with HBOT. Articles published in English or Spanish between January 2011 and May 2025 were included. Data were synthesized descriptively.
resultsTwenty-four studies met inclusion criteria, consisting primarily of case reports and small case series. HBOT was most often used as an adjunct to established therapies, including hyaluronidase, antiplatelet agents, vasodilators, and thrombolytic therapy. Reported HBOT protocols varied substantially, with treatment pressures of 2.0 to 3.0 atmospheres absolute and session durations of 60 to 120 minutes. Outcomes were heterogeneous and frequently confounded by multimodal management.
conclusionHBOT has been reported as an adjunctive intervention in selected cases of FIVO, but evidence remains limited to low-level observational data, highlighting the need for standardized protocols and prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42459244PMC13372304What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.