ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Collaborative care treatment for major depressive disorder.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) is a burdensome behavioral health condition that is costly and difficult to treat, particularly for patients with severe cases. The Collaborative Care Model (CoCM) has been shown to be effective for moderate depression treatment but less is known about its effectiveness for severe depression. This study analyzes the impact of CoCM treatment on outcomes for depression patients across all ranges of MDD severity at Concert Health. Materials and methods: Analysis was completed utilizing all closed patient treatment episodes (N = 30,162) at Concert Health between 2018 and 2025. Of these patients, 5,693 began treatment with severe depression. We compare effect sizes for change between baseline and final screener scores across severity levels. Additionally, we utilize logistic regression to complete analyses to understand treatment factors and patient characteristics that are associated with treatment response and remission, as measured by changes in PHQ-9 scores. Results: The primary analysis showed that patients with severe depression (PHQ-9 > 20) had slightly lower odds of achieving response compared to patients with moderate depression (OR: 0.93). The treatment factors of insurance type, suicide risk, anxiety presence, and touchpoints also had significant effects on the odds of achieving response and remission. Discussion: The results suggest that CoCM may be effective for patients with severe depression in achieving treatment response. Patients on Medicaid or with more complex conditions such as anxiety presence or elevated risk for suicide may need higher levels of engagement from the care team to achieve response and remission.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.