ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Androgen receptor signaling organizes ferroptosis escape in castration-resistant prostate cancer: a threshold-based model for therapeutic timing.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains the lethal endpoint of prostate cancer progression, driven by the persistence and adaptive reprogramming of androgen receptor (AR) signaling under therapeutic pressure. Although AR-ferroptosis crosstalk has been increasingly recognized, current models are largely descriptive and fail to explain why ferroptosis escape becomes a stable feature of resistant disease. Here, we propose that in CRPC, AR signaling functions not merely as a molecular regulator, but as the dominant state organizer of ferroptosis resistance, whereas ferroptosis influences AR primarily through a special feedback modulation rather than as an initiating driver of resistance evolution. We further suggest that this state can be understood through the concept of a ferroptosis threshold, which is shaped by AR across four interconnected axes: anti-ferroptotic defense, membrane lipid substrate ecology, edox buffering and iron toxicity boundary. Within this framework, mitochondria emerge not as passive effectors, but as central integrative hubs that couple metabolic rewiring, iron handling, reactive oxygen species control, and organelle communication to consolidate ferroptosis resistance. Building on this view, we propose a temporal model of AR-driven ferroptosis escape in CRPC, spanning an early vulnerability window after AR pathway inhibition, a phase of adaptive anti-ferroptotic reconstruction, and the eventual establishment of a resistant steady state. This model provides a theoretical basis for stage-specific therapeutic intervention. It supports both "early interception" during the vulnerability window and "late-state destabilization" after resistant homeostasis has been established. In addition, it provides a rationale for biomarker-guided dynamic monitoring and temporally informed combination therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.