ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Harnessing AI-driven approaches for detecting metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, assessing fibrosis, and stratifying hepatocellular carcinoma risk: a scoping review.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent chronic liver disorder worldwide and a major risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Its rising prevalence and progression to HCC present major clinical and public health challenges. Current diagnostic and prognostic tools lack accuracy in predicting disease progression and early HCC risk. Emerging approaches, including artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning (ML), and polygenic risk scores (PRS) offer promising opportunities and improvements in non-invasive diagnosis, risk stratification, and precision medicine. Methods: We conducted a scoping review synthesising evidence on the application of PRS and AI/ML models for predicting and detecting MASLD, assessing fibrosis, and stratifying risk of HCC among individuals with MASLD/NAFLD, with a particular focus on European and Asian populations. The review was performed in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines and aimed to map the development trajectory and knowledge structure of predictive approaches for MASLD/NAFLD-HCC risk stratification, while identifying key translational challenges and opportunities. Results: Evidence from the included studies indicates a shift from isolated methodological innovation towards integrated, explainable, and clinically validated multimodal models, supported by transparent AI/ML systems aligned with regulatory frameworks. There is also a critical need for large, multi-centre validation studies and interdisciplinary collaboration among clinicians, data scientists, and policymakers to enable scalable and equitable implementation. Furthermore, progress depends on moving from theoretical promise to clinical reality through prospective trials that assess real-world effectiveness and adoption pathways. Conclusion: This review highlights advances in AI and PRS for HCC risk prediction in MASLD/NAFLD, demonstrating that multimodal models outperform traditional approaches. AI-driven methods show strong potential for MASLD detection, fibrosis assessment, and HCC risk stratification, with implications for improved clinical outcomes. However, translation into practice is limited by poor genetic integration, lack of validation, population bias, and limited explainability. Further validation, standardization, and clinical integration are required for widespread adoption and effective personalised surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.