ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bifidobacterium bifidum is a key member of the human gut microbiota with well-recognised roles in intestinal homeostasis, glycan metabolism, and immunomodulation. Strain 900791, isolated from the meconium of a Siberian infant, has been used as a commercial probiotic ingredient for decades and has demonstrated, in previously published clinical trials, an ability to improve lactose tolerance and reduce gastrointestinal symptoms in both children and adults; however, the genomic basis for these properties has not been characterised. Methods: We present the complete genome sequence and comprehensive in silico genomic and pangenomic analysis of B. bifidum strain 900791. Hybrid sequencing was used for genome assembly. Phylogenomic analysis, including core genome MLST (cgMLST), integrated 229 high-quality B. bifidum genomes, representing the largest dataset for this species to date. Functional annotation and carbohydrate-active enzyme (CAZyme) profiling, antimicrobial resistance prediction, and bioinformatic screening for probiotic-associated genomic features were also performed. Results: Hybrid sequencing yielded a single circular chromosome of 2,280,092 bp, comprising 1,852 protein-coding sequences. Phylogenomic analysis revealed that strain 900791 belongs to a clonal subgroup of nine closely related strains (>99% cgMLST identity), consistent with a geographically structured lineage. The species pangenome comprised 4,152 orthogroups and a core of 1,450 gene families; 23 orthogroups were exclusive to the 900791 clonal subgroup, including a predicted lantibiotic biosynthetic cluster. CAZyme profiling identified glycoside hydrolase families associated with human milk oligosaccharide degradation (GH2, GH20, GH33, GH84), mucin glycan cleavage (including ten GH families), and lactose metabolism (GH2, GH42). Safety assessment identified only species-typical resistance to mupirocin and rifampicin, with no acquired resistance markers. Bioinformatic screening of the clonal subgroup detected the presence of adhesion-associated proteins, acid resistance systems, bile salt tolerance determinants, oxidative stress response proteins, and two putative bacteriocin gene clusters. Discussion: These findings provide a genomic framework consistent with the documented clinical role of strain 900791 in lactose tolerance and support its further investigation as a candidate probiotic. The probiotic-associated features identified here may help explain its observed properties and represent priority targets for experimental validation in future in vitro and in vivo studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.