ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Co-designing Nova Sleepcare: identifying priority areas for implementation.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Co-designing Nova Sleepcare: exploring in-clinic, physician-delivered sleep education.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sleep problems are common in youth with neurodevelopmental disorders and directly contribute to behaviors of concern. While behavioral sleep education improves both issues, a disconnect exists between research and clinical reality: evidence-based sleep interventions are mainly delivered through specialized clinics and multi-week programs, which are often inaccessible to families needing immediate support. To bridge this gap we co-designed with end-users, a physician-delivered, point-of-care active sleep education intervention called Nova Sleepcare that can be directly implemented in clinical and household setting. Objective: To identify end-user priorities for learning about, implementing, and supporting Nova Sleepcare in clinical and household settings through consensus methods. Methods: Fifteen end-users (four youth, six caregivers, and five pediatric physicians) participated in structured nominal group technique sessions. Each group addressed questions about: (1) youth and caregiver's preferred methods for learning about Nova Sleepcare from physicians; (2) implementation barriers and support needs at home reported by caregivers and youth; and (3) physician training requirements and clinical implementation support. Priorities were ranked using consensus voting. Results: Top-ranked priorities varied by end-users. Caregivers prioritized pre-appointment information materials and stepwise instructions. Youth emphasized visual learning tools and app-based progress tracking. Physicians prioritized a streamlined script, needs assessment to guide training, and dissemination through conferences and in-person meetings. Cross-cutting themes included flexible delivery formats and ongoing implementation support beyond initial training. Conclusion: This consensus-building process with end-users identified distinct but complementary implementation priorities for Nova Sleepcare. These findings inform a multi-level implementation strategy addressing both clinical delivery and household adoption needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.