ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
JAK inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease: a review of mechanisms and clinical evidence.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, as oral targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), represent a promising therapeutic option for rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD). Preclinical studies suggest a dual mechanism, inhibiting the pro-fibrotic interleukin-17A (IL-17A)/JAK2/nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) axis in lung fibroblasts and modulating lung immunity. Clinical evidence, primarily from observational studies and meta-analyses, indicates that JAK inhibitors do not increase the risk of incident ILD and may stabilize or improve lung function and radiological findings in established RA-ILD, showing comparable efficacy to abatacept or rituximab. However, recent real-world data highlight potential safety concerns, suggesting a higher risk of mortality and severe outcomes compared to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors, particularly in older patients or those with cardiovascular comorbidities. While effective, the use of JAK inhibitors in RA-ILD requires careful patient selection and risk-benefit assessment, underscoring the need for confirmatory randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.