ArticleFrontiers in lupus2026
Adverse pregnancy outcome associations among women prior to a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.
Article in Frontiers in lupus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Immune dysregulation years prior to a clinical diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may include a range of asymptomatic autoantibody positivity to clinically evident disease. The effect of this spectrum of immune dysregulation on pregnancy outcomes, including pregnancies in women prior to a diagnosis of SLE, is poorly understood. We sought to identify associations of adverse pregnancy outcomes across groups along this spectrum. Methods: Utilizing a large longitudinal cohort at a single center, we evaluated pregnancy outcomes among the following four groups: antinuclear antibody (ANA) negative controls, ANA-positive controls, pregnancies before a diagnosis of SLE, and pregnancies after a diagnosis of SLE. The pregnancy outcomes considered were live birth rate, preeclampsia, low birth weight, premature birth, spontaneous abortion, and stillbirth. Generalized estimating equation models were used to evaluate key associations and confounders. Results: We included 811 participants and 2,209 pregnancies. Of these, 198 participants were ANA-positive controls and 369 were diagnosed with SLE, with their first pregnancy occurring before diagnosis. Overall, 81.5% self-identified as Black and 31% had resided in areas with high social vulnerability. The median number of pregnancies between the groups was similar, with the majority of participants having at least one live birth. The lowest median number of pregnancies occurred in the pregnancy after SLE diagnosis group. The adverse outcome rate did not differ between the ANA-positive and ANA-negative controls. The risk of any adverse outcome was greatest in those with pregnancies after an SLE diagnosis [OR (95% CI): 3.33 (2.35, 4.71)], but was also increased in those with pregnancies before a diagnosis of SLE as compared to the ANA-positive controls [OR (95% CI): 1.78 (1.28, 2.47)]. When grouped by time prior to diagnosis, the risk of any adverse outcome remained increased in pregnancies occurring both 2-5 years or greater than 5 years prior to SLE diagnosis as compared to the ANA-positive controls [OR (95% CI): 1.64 (1.01, 2.67) and OR (95% CI): 1.65 (1.17, 2.32), respectively]. Conclusion: The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes appears to increase along the SLE spectrum, with the highest risk occurring after diagnosis. ANA positivity alone is not sufficient to impact pregnancy outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.