ArticleJAMIA open2026
Scalable extraction of social determinants of health from clinical notes in a sepsis cohort using instruction-tuned language models.
Article in JAMIA open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Social determinants of health (SDOH) are incompletely captured in structured electronic health records (EHRs) but are frequently documented in unstructured clinical notes. We evaluated large language models (LLMs) for extracting SDOH from clinical text. Materials and Methods: We constructed an adult sepsis cohort from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment ≥2) and analyzed clinical notes from 1 year prior to 30 days following suspected infection. Three instruction‑tuned, decoder‑only LLMs (Mistral‑Instruct‑7B-v0.2, DeepSeek‑R1‑Distill‑Qwen‑14B, and GPT‑oss‑20B) were evaluated using structured prompts with predefined label schemas and few‑shot examples. Performance was benchmarked against a clinically validated annotated dataset and compared with a fine‑tuned encoder‑decoder baseline. Macro‑F1 scores were reported. A gold‑standard Intensive Care Unit (ICU) sepsis subset was independently annotated by 3 reviewers to assess domain‑level performance and ensemble strategies. Results: Decoder‑only models outperformed the fine‑tuned encoder‑decoder baseline across SDOH domains. GPT‑oss achieved the highest macro‑F1 score (0.79) compared with Flan‑T5‑XXL (0.57). Prompt refinement substantially improved extraction accuracy. Ensemble majority voting increased robustness across domains, while unanimous agreement yielded high precision but limited coverage. In a subsequent mortality analysis, extracted SDOH did not independently predict 30-day mortality, which was instead associated with established clinical and demographic risk factors. Discussion: Instruction‑tuned decoder‑only LLMs can reliably extract multiclass SDOH from unstructured clinical notes without task‑specific fine‑tuning. Ensemble and agreement‑based strategies provide practical operating points for high‑precision clinical deployment. Conclusion: These findings support the feasibility of leveraging LLMs to enrich EHRs with structured SDOH data, providing a scalable approach for incorporating social context into downstream risk stratification and health outcome prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.