ArticleFrontiers in digital health2026
A personalized and automated real-time meal detection algorithm based on continuous glucose monitoring and heart rate data for individuals with post-bariatric hypoglycemia.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) sensors are increasingly used to identify and manage post-bariatric hypoglycemia (PBH) and to support decision support systems (DSSs) for proactive glucose management. Despite meal timing being key information for these systems, automated, wearable-based meal detection remains an unmet clinical need. Methods: We present a real-time meal detection algorithm for individuals with PBH that combines CGM and heart rate (HR) signals. The algorithm is a heuristic decision-tree model based on four individualized features extracted from CGM (rate of change, glucose relative excursion, glucose peak value) and HR (peak value). It was developed and tested using a dataset of 40 PBH patients monitored for up to 50 days with a Dexcom G6 CGM and a Garmin Venu Sq smartwatch, and its performance was evaluated in both controlled and free-living conditions, benchmarked against state-of-the-art CGM-only meal detection methods for the PBH population. Results: The algorithm achieved 100% recall in the controlled setting and, in free-living conditions, an average precision of 85% and recall of 78%. It also reduced false positives compared with CGM-only algorithms (one every 2.3 days vs. one every 1.3 days). Discussion: Eliminating the need for manual meal announcement, the proposed algorithm overcomes a key barrier to fully automated glucose management, reducing patient burden while maintaining reliable detection performance even in unstructured, free-living conditions. These results support the integration of the algorithm into DSSs for PBH and other populations, where timely and accurate meal detection is critical.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.