ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Implementation of a nursing assessment framework in the postanesthesia care unit: a pre-post implementation design.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Structured nursing assessment during the postanesthesia period is critical for patient safety, yet assessment practices in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) often remain inconsistent. The Nursing Assessment Framework for Patients in the Anesthesia Recovery Period (NAF-PARP) was previously developed, but its implementation and impact have not been evaluated. This study aimed to implement NAF-PARP in a PACU and assess its effects on nursing assessment quality and the incidence of nursing defects. Methods: This study used a pre- and post-intervention quality improvement design. A total of 90 patients admitted between September and December 2024 were assessed using the existing model (control group). After a 2-month training program for nurses (January-February 2025), a second group of 90 patients admitted between March and June 2025 was assessed using NAF-PARP (intervention group). Outcome measures included scores for different assessment domains and the incidence of nursing defects. Results: Improvements were observed in physical assessment, clinical judgment, and organizational efficiency in the intervention group. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of nursing defects between the two groups. Conclusion: Implementation of NAF-PARP was associated with improvements in key domains of nursing assessment quality but did not reduce nursing defects. These findings support the value of structured assessment frameworks in postanesthesia nursing while highlighting the complexity of translating process improvements into patient safety outcomes. Further research is warranted to explore longer-term effects and system-level strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.