Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42460081›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Skin malformation assessment by triple wavelength imaging.

Janis Spigulis, Ilze Irbe, Uldis Rubins, Edgars Kviesis-Kipge, Marta Skrastina

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janis SpigulisBiophotonics Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology, Institute of Atomic Physics and Spectroscopy, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Ilze IrbeBiophotonics Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology, Institute of Atomic Physics and Spectroscopy, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Uldis RubinsBiophotonics Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology, Institute of Atomic Physics and Spectroscopy, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Edgars Kviesis-KipgeBiophotonics Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology, Institute of Atomic Physics and Spectroscopy, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.
Marta SkrastinaBiophotonics Laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology, Institute of Atomic Physics and Spectroscopy, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This invited paper reviews recent results achieved by snapshot triple wavelength imaging of skin, a method ensuring high spectral and spatial resolution within sub-second imaging time, avoiding motion artefacts in the spectral image sets. Designs of the developed diagnostic equipment and the related image processing solutions are discussed along with outcomes of their clinical validation on volunteers with various skin malformations, including cancers. The initial contact technology for single skin lesion spectral imaging in the visible range has been extended to remote full body or large area multi-lesion image acquisition and analysis, including also near-infrared skin images. The potential of triple wavelength imaging for implementation in routine dermatological practice is discussed.

Indexed as

avoided motion artefactsdiagnostic spectral imagingmulti-laser illuminationprototype validationskin

Identifiers

PMID42460081
PMCPMC13368530

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.