ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Sensor-based assessment of the acute effects of NMES combined with weighted squats on muscle activation and lower limb joint coordination during the stop-and-cut task.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The stop-and-cut (SAC) is a key movement pattern in many competitive sports and directly influences braking, directional transition, and re-acceleration performance. However, the acute effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with weighted squats on SAC-related performance, muscle activation, and lower limb joint coordination remain unclear. Methods: Thirty-six male basketball athletes were randomly assigned to a loaded squat group (LS), a sham stimulation combined with loaded squat group (SSLS), or a true stimulation combined with loaded squat group (TSLS). A randomized, single-blind, pre-post intervention design was adopted. The key feature of this study was the integration of external performance testing with synchronized motion-sensor assessment during the SAC task, including surface electromyography, infrared 3D motion capture, and force plate data. V-cut test performance was used as the external indicator, while root mean square (RMS), integrated electromyography (iEMG), and lower limb joint coordination variables were extracted during the SAC support phase. A 3-group × 2-time mixed-design ANOVA was used for statistical analysis. Results: Only the TSLS group showed a significant improvement in V-cut test performance, with a significant intervention effect observed (F = 16.27, P< 0.001, η² = 0.606). During the SAC full support phase, significant group × time interactions in RMS were found for GM (F = 14.62, P< 0.001, η² = 0.587), VM (F = 13.48, P< 0.001, η² = 0.565), and BF (F = 12.91, P< 0.001, η² = 0.551). Similar significant interactions in iEMG were also observed for GM (F = 15.26, P< 0.001, η² = 0.601), VM (F = 14.11, P< 0.001, η² = 0.578), and BF (F = 13.37, P< 0.001, η² = 0.562). For lower limb joint coordination, more evident significant effects were observed in the hip-knee and knee-ankle couplings, whereas fewer significant changes were found in the hip-ankle coupling. Conclusion: NMES combined with weighted squats was more effective than weighted squats alone or sham stimulation combined with weighted squats in acutely improving SAC-related performance. This improvement was accompanied by enhanced activation of key lower limb muscles and more evident changes in lower limb joint coordination, suggesting that this combined intervention may be an effective acute strategy for improving SAC-related movement performance and control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.