ArticleFrontiers in physiology2026
Transformer architecture for diagnosing schizophrenia disabilities through EEG analysis.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Schizophrenia (SZ) presents significant diagnostic challenges in clinical practice. Methods: In this study, we explore novel deep learning approaches for the automated detection of this severe psychiatric disorder through electroencephalography (EEG) analysis. Using a publicly available dataset of EEG recordings from 14 SZ patients and 14 healthy controls, we developed a robust processing pipeline that includes bandpass filtering (0.5-45 Hz), artifact removal through Independent Component Analysis, and signal enhancement via wavelet transformation. Our feature extraction approach captured both temporal characteristics, including statistical measures such as mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis, as well as spectral properties, including power distributions across the delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands. By combining the F-score method, based on Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Mutual Information assessment, and random forest techniques, we identified 27 highly discriminative features from the original set of 171 extracted features. We developed and evaluated two novel architectures: an LSTM-based model and a Transformer-based model. Both incorporated attention mechanisms and multi-scale temporal convolutional networks to effectively capture the complex patterns in EEG signals. Results: While the LSTM model performed strongly with 95.65% accuracy (± 0.16%), 96.28% sensitivity (± 0.59%), and 95.26% specificity (3.84%), our Transformer-based model achieved even more impressive results: 98.20% accuracy (± 0.20%), 98.11% sensitivity (± 0.28%), and 98.12% specificity (± 0.40%) by using k-fold cross-validation. The Transformer-based was achieved 76.95% in Leave-One-Subject-Out (LOSO) cross-validation. These findings highlight the potential of transformer architectures to detect the subtle neurophysiological markers of schizophrenia in EEG recordings. Discussion: Our approach could eventually provide clinicians with an objective tool to support earlier and more accurate diagnosis of schizophrenia, potentially improving treatment outcomes through timely intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.