Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42460396›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioinformatics2026

Metabolite coupling analysis and metabolite-flux coupling analysis of genome-scale metabolic models.

Mingyuan Tian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mingyuan TianDepartment of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Funding

Systems Biology Identifies Restriction Factors for West Nile VirusU19AI106772 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI KAWAOKA, YOSHIHIRO · 2013 to 2017
$26.1M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI106772
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) provide detailed representations of metabolic networks. Flux Coupling Analysis (FCA) is widely used for analyzing dependencies between reaction fluxes in GEMs. Results: We introduce Metabolite Coupling Analysis (MCA) and Metabolite-flux Coupling Analysis (MetFCA), two methods that extend FCA concepts from reactions to metabolites and metabolite-reaction pairs, enabling the identification of condition-specific modules for omics (e.g., transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics) data analysis. Conclusion: MCA and MetFCA, together with FCA, provide a unified framework for generating condition-specific modules in GEMs. These modules exhibit clearer biological functions than those generated by statistical, data-driven approaches. A case study demonstrates the use of gene modules to analyze transcriptomics data in the influenza-infected Calu-3 cell line.

Indexed as

coupling analysismetabolomicsmodulesmulti-omicsomics data analysisproteomicstranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID42460396
PMCPMC13370160

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.