Evidence mapPaperPMID 42460416Full record

ReviewMolecular therapy. Advances2026

Designs of the clinical trials aiming at evaluating cell and gene therapy products: A critical appraisal from a literature review.

Lucie Biard, Vincent Lévy, Sylvie Chevret, JOIN4ATMP consortium

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular therapy. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lucie BiardECSTRRA Team, UMR 1342, Institut de Recherche Saint Louis (IRSL), Inserm, Université Paris Cité, 75010 Paris, France.
Vincent LévyECSTRRA Team, UMR 1342, Institut de Recherche Saint Louis (IRSL), Inserm, Université Paris Cité, 75010 Paris, France.
Sylvie ChevretECSTRRA Team, UMR 1342, Institut de Recherche Saint Louis (IRSL), Inserm, Université Paris Cité, 75010 Paris, France.
JOIN4ATMP consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs). However, there is debate about how they should be clinically evaluated. We aimed to assess the heterogeneity of trial designs used for ATMPs, based on a review of the most recently published ATMP trials from 2022 to 2024, and then make recommendations to improve the level of evidence. The 276 selected trials concerned CAR-T cells (28%), other gene therapies (22%), and somatic cell therapy (50%) and targeted different underlying diseases, hematological malignancies for CAR-T cells, genetic or congenital diseases for gene therapy, and other diseases for somatic cells (

Indexed as

advanced therapy medicinal productscell therapyclinical trialsgene therapytrial design

Identifiers

PMID42460416
PMCPMC13370169

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.