ArticleJAC-antimicrobial resistance2026
An evaluation of the impact of a national facilitated antimicrobial stewardship e-learning course on learners' practice in Egypt.
Article in JAC-antimicrobial resistance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In Egypt, the political commitment to addressing antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is increasing and there is an ambition to rapidly scale up antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) in hospitals. The British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy (BSAC) partnered with World Health Organization (WHO) Egypt to support this goal through structured education and training. A country-specific, accredited, facilitated online AMS training course with an interactive live session was developed. Objectives: To evaluate participants' feedback regarding this course and identify translation of knowledge into AMS interventions and programmes. Methods: Formal evaluation of learning (all 15 cohorts) and translation into action (cohorts 1-3) was undertaken via a post-course survey using a head, heart and hands approach, then follow-up surveys at 3 and 6 months were used to identify application of knowledge in practice. Results: To date, 1776 learners from across Egypt have undertaken the training over 15 cohorts, of which 74.7% passed the post-course test. Overall, feedback was positive, and participants highlighted several immediate actions they had planned in their hospital. At the 3-month follow-up the most frequently reported AMS interventions were new guidelines and education, and changes to microbiology testing. At 6 months, guidelines remained the most frequent AMS intervention. Staff collaboration was a reported facilitator to establishing AMS, while resistance from physicians was a perceived barrier. Conclusions: This course presents an efficient way to roll out AMS education on a national scale with support from government authorities and healthcare organizations. This learning model could be replicated in other countries and contexts to support high-level commitment to AMS.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.