ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026
BatchSVG: identifying batch-biased genes in the application of spatially variable gene detection.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
summaryA standard task in the analysis of spatially resolved transcriptomics (SRT) data is to identify spatially variable genes (SVGs). This is most commonly done within one tissue section at a time because the spatial relationships between the tissue sections are typically unknown. However, large-scale spatial atlases are being generated, for example across hundreds of donors, where the goal is to identify a common set of SVGs to use for downstream analyses. One challenge is how to identify and remove SVGs that are associated with a known bias or technical artifact, such as the slide, which can lead to poor performance in downstream analyses, such as spatial domain detection. Here, we introduce BatchSVG, a tool to identify batch-biased genes SVGs. Our approach compares the rank of per-gene deviance under a binomial model (i) with and (ii) without including a covariate in the model that is associated with the known bias or technical artifact. If the rank of a gene changes significantly between these models, then we infer that this gene is likely associated with the bias or technical artifact and should be removed from the downstream analyses. We consider two SRT datasets and show how our model can improve the results of downstream analyses. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The BatchSVG package is freely available at https://bioconductor.org/packages/BatchSVG, and the code to reproduce the figures is publicly available at https://github.com/kinnaryshah/BatchSVG-analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.