ArticleHealth promotion international2026
'Walking is the means to bring you together': understanding men's participation and non-participation in a group walking programme in Australia.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Men remain underrepresented in community-based physical activity (PA) programmes despite experiencing a disproportionate burden of preventable chronic disease. Understanding how men experience participation in group-based walking programmes is important for informing strategies to better support their engagement in PA behaviour. This study explored how men's engagement and non-engagement with a national walking programme in Australia were experienced and understood from multiple perspectives. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 participants, including male walkers, walk organizers, men who do not participate in walking groups, and programme staff. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Engagement was supported when participation afforded autonomy, belonging, and meaningful contribution. These conditions occurred through everyday practices such as pausing to accommodate different paces, meeting for coffee after walks, greeting newcomers, and sharing group photographs. Practical roles and opportunities to contribute strengthened engagement, whereas directive leadership reduced autonomy and discouraged participation. Non-engagement was shaped by assumptions about walking groups as aimless or misaligned with men's current circumstances, alongside concerns about directive leadership that could limit autonomy. Across accounts, what appeared most salient to men was the opportunity to participate in ways that felt purposeful and contributive within an environment that fostered a sense of belonging. These findings highlight the importance of autonomy-supportive leadership and recognition of locally developed group practices in the design or adaptation of community-based PA programmes for men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.