ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2026
Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Brain Metastasis at Initial Diagnosis in Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Model Development and SHAP Interpretation Study.
Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBrain metastasis (BM) in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is typically associated with poor survival rates and quality of life, making the timely identification of patients with a high likelihood of BM at diagnosis crucial.
aimsTo develop and validate a machine learning (ML) prediction model for BM in the overall SCLC population and provide an interpretable and clinically accessible risk assessment tool. METHODS AND
resultsUnivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify BM-associated factors. Eight ML algorithms were applied to build the model. The model performance was quantified using the area under the curve (AUC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC). SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was used to interpret the best-performing model. A web calculator was developed to facilitate individualized BM risk estimation. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that age, T stage, tumor size, bone metastasis, lung metastasis, and distant lymph node metastasis were independently associated with BM. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB) achieved the best discrimination in the validation cohort, with an AUC of 0.8762, AUPRC of 0.9025, accuracy of 0.7974, precision of 0.8009, recall of 0.7974, specificity of 0.8516, MCC of 0.5983, F1-score of 0.7968, and Brier score of 0.1377. Cross-validation demonstrated similarly strong performance. SHAP analysis identified age, tumor size, T stage, distant lymph node metastasis, bone metastasis, and lung metastasis as the strongest contributors to BM risk. A web-based risk calculator was developed to facilitate exploratory risk stratification and individualized BM risk estimation.
conclusionWe created and internally validated an interpretable ML model to identify brain metastasis at diagnosis in SCLC, with XGB showing the best performance. Its web-based tool may assist in identifying patients with a higher likelihood of brain metastasis at diagnosis and provide supplementary risk stratification information for exploratory clinical assessment. Further prospective validation is required before routine clinical implementation of this model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.