ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2026
Sex differences in hip bone and sacrum morphology: a geometric morphometric analysis.
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The pelvis plays a crucial role in sex estimation when reconstructing an individual's biological profile from skeletal remains. The present study aims to evaluate the sex differences in size and shape of the hip bones and sacrum using geometric morphometrics and to compare the degree of sexual dimorphism captured by size and shape variables within and between these skeletal elements. The study sample included the abdominal computed tomography scans of 255 adult Bulgarians (125 males and 130 females). Surface models of the pelvis were generated and used for landmark digitization. The three-dimensional coordinates of 35 landmarks were collected from the left and right hip bones, and 34 landmarks were recorded from the sacrum. The landmark data of each bone were subjected to Generalized Procrustes Analysis, Principal Component Analysis, Procrustes ANOVA, and classification methods (linear discriminant analysis of centroid size and support vector machine analysis of shape variables). In the present study, classification accuracies were interpreted as indicators of sexual dimorphism within the studied sample rather than as estimates of predictive model performance. The results indicated that the size and shape of all three bones differed significantly between males and females. The ability of centroid size to distinguish between the sexes was low, with classification accuracies of 69% for the right and left hip bones and 66% for the sacrum. In contrast, shape variables exhibited substantially greater sex differentiation, with values of 99% for the right and left hip bones and 91% for the sacrum, indicating pronounced sexual dimorphism in the shape of these bones within the studied sample.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42461406What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.