ReviewAmerican journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions2026
Using Artificial Intelligence to Identify Patterns and Predictors of Adverse Drug Reactions in Cardiovascular Patients: A Comprehensive Narrative Review.
Review in American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool for improving the detection, prediction, and prevention of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in cardiovascular (CV) medicine, a domain characterized by high drug utilization, complex multimorbidity, and substantial polypharmacy. Traditional pharmacovigilance (PV) systems, particularly spontaneous reporting, remain limited by underreporting, variable data quality, and delayed signal recognition, underscoring the need for computationally enhanced approaches. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on AI applications across the cardiovascular PV continuum, including safety signal detection, patient-level risk prediction, and text-based surveillance. Machine learning (ML) models, applied to structured datasets such as the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), VigiBase, and electronic health records (EHRs), and curated drug-target databases have shown improved discriminatory performance compared with conventional approaches in identifying bleeding risk under direct oral anticoagulants, predicting acute kidney injury in patients with heart failure, and estimating susceptibility to drug-induced QT prolongation, primarily in internal validation settings. Natural language processing (NLP) advances, particularly transformer-based models, further facilitate extraction of drug-event relationships from clinical notes and patient-generated content. Despite these advances, major challenges persist, including data heterogeneity, selective reporting biases, mechanistic ambiguity in CV ADRs, and limited external validation. Ethical considerations, including privacy preservation, algorithmic transparency, bias mitigation, and human oversight, remain critical for responsible implementation. Looking forward, the integration of real-time biosignal streams from wearable devices, multimodal multiomics data, and explainable AI frameworks may further refine individualized risk assessment and facilitate earlier detection of cardiotoxic events in appropriately validated settings. Collectively, AI holds substantial promise for enhancing cardiovascular drug safety, provided its deployment is accompanied by rigorous validation, robust governance, and alignment with clinical workflows.
Identifiers
42461503What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.