ArticlePloS one2026
Signal mining and analysis of adverse events associated with Isotretinoin: A 20-Year real-world pharmacovigilance study based on FAERS and EudraVigilance databases.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically characterize the post-marketing safety signals of isotretinoin using real-world data from the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), with independent external validation in the European EudraVigilance (EV) database.
methodsAdverse event (AE) reports in FAERS from 2004Q1 to 2024Q3 were analyzed. Signal detection was conducted using four complementary disproportionality algorithms: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS). Signals concurrently detected by all four methods were defined as robust. Key findings were subsequently examined in EV as an external reference.
resultsAmong 50,519 patients contributing 142,160 isotretinoin-associated AE reports, 469 statistically robust signals were identified, spanning 25 system organ classes (SOCs). Signals were most concentrated in psychiatric disorders (75, 15.99%), gastrointestinal disorders (58, 12.37%), and congenital, familial, and genetic disorders (50, 10.66%). The strongest association was observed for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD; ROR = 579.14); however, temporal clustering and reporter-type profiling suggested substantial stimulated reporting, potentially driven by litigation, warranting cautious interpretation. Several high-ranking signals were not described in current product labeling, including nasal vestibulitis, hypertrophic anal papilla, and SAPHO syndrome. Pregnancy-related signals were prominent, with unintended pregnancy showing a strong signal (ROR = 91.39). External validation in EV demonstrated high concordance, supporting the robustness and reproducibility of the findings.
conclusionsIsotretinoin is associated with a broad spectrum of pharmacovigilance signals, with disproportionate representation of psychiatric, gastrointestinal, and pregnancy-related events. While multiple previously unlabelled signals emerged, their clinical relevance remains to be established. These findings underscore the need for strengthened clinical monitoring, rigorous pregnancy prevention strategies, and careful interpretation of spontaneous reporting data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.