ArticlePloS one2026
A survey of UK and Irish veterinary and veterinary nursing Students' engagement with small animal nutrition information.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global prevalence of diet-related non-communicable disease is rising, along with popularity of unconventional and alternative diets and the availability of unsubstantiated information. Considerable confusion and misinformation exist regarding nutrition and dietary choices. The veterinary healthcare team needs to be a trusted and primary source of sound nutritional advice and be able to signpost clients to appropriate nutrition information. This study's objective was to establish the sources of nutrition information used by first-year veterinary students (VS) and veterinary nursing students (VNS) in the UK and Republic of Ireland. Participants were recruited by non-probability, convenience purposive sampling, by email invitation from educational providers. Data were collected between October 2023 and January 2024. Participation was voluntary and informed consent obtained. 135 VS and 186 VNS completed the online survey. Most (82%, n = 211) expressed an interest in learning about small animal nutrition. Qualified veterinarians were perceived to be more knowledgeable about pet nutrition (73%, n = 270) than veterinary nurses (53%, n = 132). Veterinary healthcare professional and journal articles ranked most valued sources of information, with media, social media, and friends/family least valuable. Students considered evidence-based information for dietary decisions by pet caregivers (93%, n = 213) to be important, yet only 53% (n = 138) felt sufficiently knowledgeable to access evidence-based nutritional information. This investigation highlights the paradox that trusted nutrition information sources are not always the most used. This insight into the nutrition information-seeking behaviour of student veterinary professionals can help inform educators in the provision of skills and knowledge to evaluate information and utilise trustworthy sources.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.