ArticleNursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals2026
Nursing Moral Agency in Technology-Mediated Care: Reclaiming Professional Responsibility in the Fifth Industrial Revolution.
Article in Nursing philosophy : an international journal for healthcare professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nursing practice is increasingly enacted within environments structured by intelligent technologies that filter perception, generate classifications and shape clinical priorities. While nurse scholars have begun to examine moral agency in the context of artificial intelligence, much of the broader ethical discourse on AI in healthcare continues to foreground governance, safety and institutional accountability, leaving the conditions under which nurses exercise professional moral responsibility comparatively under-theorized. This paper argues that technology-mediated care constitutes a moral environment that reshapes how responsibility is distributed, interpreted and enacted in clinical practice. Drawing on nursing ethics and socio-technical thought, it distinguishes between technical delegation and moral delegation, clarifying that while intelligent systems may inform action, they cannot assume moral answerability. Nursing moral agency is reconceptualized as relationally oriented moral perception, interpretive judgement and accountable action that remains fundamentally non-delegable, even under conditions of extensive mediation. Boundary-setting is advanced as a disciplined ethical practice through which nurses delineate the limits of technological authority and sustain professional responsibility. By articulating moral agency as both situated and irreducible, this analysis contributes a conceptual framework for understanding ethical responsibility in the Fifth Industrial Revolution and re-centres the nurse as the accountable moral subject within technology-mediated care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.