Trial reportBMC complementary medicine and therapies2026
Efficacy and safety of green-lipped mussel powder supplementation in adults with knee osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent degenerative joint disease associated with pain, functional limitation, and reduced quality of life. Although nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are widely prescribed, long-term use is limited by safety concerns. Green-lipped mussel powder (GLMP) has demonstrated anti-inflammatory and chondroprotective effects in preclinical studies. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of GLMP supplementation in adults with knee OA.
methodsAdults aged 40-75 years with symptomatic radiographic knee OA were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive GLMP (1,000 mg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks. Assessments occurred at baseline, week 6, and week 12. The primary endpoint was change in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) total score. Secondary endpoints were WOMAC subscales (pain, stiffness, physical function), visual analog scale (VAS) pain, and inflammatory biomarkers (C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]). The per-protocol (PP) set included 93 participants (GLMP, 47; placebo, 46); the intention-to-treat (ITT) set included 100.
resultsA total of 100 participants were randomized and included in the ITT population, and 93 completed the study and were included in the PP population. In the PP analysis, GLMP resulted in greater improvement in WOMAC total score at week 12 than placebo (between-group difference - 3.66; 95% CI - 6.87 to - 0.45; p = 0.032). Significant between-group differences were also observed for WOMAC pain (p = 0.026), WOMAC physical function (p = 0.027), and VAS pain (between-group difference - 19.93 mm; 95% CI - 25.31 to - 14.55; p < 0.001). In the ITT analysis, the overall pattern of results was consistent with that observed in the PP analysis. WOMAC physical function (p = 0.042) and VAS pain (p < 0.001) remained significantly improved with GLMP, whereas WOMAC total score showed a non-significant trend favoring GLMP (p = 0.061). No significant between-group differences were observed in CRP or ESR levels. No clinically meaningful safety concerns were identified.
conclusionsTwelve-week supplementation with GLMP was associated with improvements in pain and physical function in adults with mild-to-moderate knee OA. Improvements in pain-related outcomes were observed consistently across PP and ITT analyses, although the primary WOMAC total outcome reached statistical significance only in the PP population. GLMP was well tolerated and may have potential as a complementary nutritional intervention for symptom management in individuals with knee OA.
trial registrationThe study was registered with the Clinical Research Information Service (CRIS; registration number KCT0008821) on September 22, 2023, and the full study protocol is available on the CRIS website ( https://cris.nih.go.kr ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.