ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2026
[Domestic ROPA surgical robot for total hip arthroplasty: An artificial bone experiments].
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and precision of the domestic total hip arthroplasty (THA)-assisted robotic system ROPA through artificial bone experiments. Methods: Robot-assisted THA was performed on 16 artificial bone models (8 left hips and 8 right hips) using the ROPA system. Preoperative CT scans were imported into the ROPA system for three-dimensional reconstruction and preoperative planning. Component size, acetabular cup position (anteversion and abduction angles), and osteotomy parameters (femoral neck osteotomy distance, offset, leg length discrepancy, and acetabular reaming bone volume) were recorded. Intraoperative probe verification accuracy, matching accuracy, remaining reaming distance, and remaining press-fit distance were documented. Postoperative three-dimensional scanning was performed to measure actual parameters, which were compared with planned values to calculate deviations. Results: Osteotomy experiments were successfully completed on all 16 hip models. Component sizes were consistent with the preoperative plan in all 16 hip models. Deviations between actual and planned values were as follows: Anteversion angle was (0.79±1.69)° and abduction angle was (0.19±2.23)°. According to the initial position of acetabular cup, abduction angle was 40° and anteversion angle was 20°. The deviation of acetabular cup anteversion angle was (40.79±1.69)° and abduction angle was (20.19±2.23)°. All acetabular cups were implanted in the Lewinnek safe zone. The femoral neck osteotomy distance was (0.31±0.38) mm, the leg length discrepancy was (0.79±1.16) mm, the hip offset was (0.69±2.21) mm, and the acetabular fossa reaming bone volume was (0.03±0.06) mm, all of which met the acceptance criteria. The probe verification accuracy was (0.18±0.16) mm, the intraoperative registration accuracy was (0.50±0.22) mm, the remaining reaming distance was (-0.19±1.05) mm, and the remaining press-fit distance was (1.88±0.89) mm, all of which were in line with the expected design error range. Conclusion: The domestic THA-assisted robotic system ROPA demonstrated favorable osteotomy accuracy, operational performance, effectiveness, and precision in artificial bone experiments. However, its long-term efficacy still requires further verification through clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.