ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Epistatic impacts of cis- and trans-regulatory mutations on the distribution of mutational effects for gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular evolution in light of regulatory-coding epistasis.EMBO reports · 2026Review
- The regulatory architecture of gene expression variation in Caenorhabditis elegans revealed by multi-strain allele-specific analysis.Genetics · 2025Article
- The regulatory architecture of gene expression variation inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epistasis can influence evolution by causing the distribution of phenotypic effects for new mutations to vary among genotypes. Here, we investigate how epistatic interactions between new mutations and an existing regulatory mutation might impact the evolution of gene expression using Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We do so by estimating the distribution of mutational effects for expression of a fluorescent reporter protein driven by the S. cerevisiae TDH3 promoter in a reference strain as well as in eight mutant strains. Each of the mutant strains differed from the reference strain by a single mutation affecting expression of the focal gene. We found that two of these regulatory mutations changed the degree of mutational robustness, as measured by the variance of the distribution of mutational effects, with one initial regulatory mutation increasing mutational robustness while another decreased it. We also found that four of our initial regulatory mutants caused a change in the relative frequency and/or effect size of mutations increasing or decreasing expression, as measured by a change in skewness relative to the reference. Strikingly, in all four of these cases, the change in skewness increased the likelihood that new mutations would at least partially compensate for the effects of the initial regulatory mutation. If this form of epistatic impact on the distribution of mutational effects is common, it should increase the fixation probability of compensatory mutations affecting traits under stabilizing selection and could help explain the prevalence of alleles with compensatory effects in natural populations of S. cerevisiae.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.