Evidence mapPaperPMID 42465024Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of cancer research2026

PARP inhibitor maintenance in first-line ovarian cancer therapy: emerging standards and strategies to overcome resistance.

Huizhen Chen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Huizhen ChenDepartment of Obstetrics, XianJu People's Hospital, Zhejiang Southeast Campus of Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated Xianju's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College Xianju, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maintenance therapy has become a central component of first-line treatment for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer, and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors now occupy a pivotal position in this setting. Their greatest benefit is observed in tumors with BRCA1/2 mutations or broader homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), where synthetic lethality can be therapeutically exploited. However, clinical use of PARP inhibitors in the frontline setting has also raised new questions regarding optimal biomarker selection, treatment duration, combination strategies, long-term safety, and management of disease that recurs after PARP exposure. In this review, we summarize the evidence supporting first-line PARP inhibitor maintenance across biomarker-defined subgroups, with particular emphasis on BRCA-mutated and HRD-positive disease. We then examine emerging strategies designed to extend benefit or overcome resistance, including combinations with anti-angiogenic agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and next-generation DNA damage response (DDR) inhibitors. Mechanisms of resistance are discussed in a translational framework that includes restoration of homologous recombination, replication-fork protection, altered PARP1 trapping, and adaptive rewiring of the DDR network. Finally, we outline practical clinical approaches to post-PARP management and highlight future priorities, including dynamic biomarkers, rational sequencing, and more individualized maintenance strategies. Taken together, current evidence supports a biomarker-driven use of frontline PARP maintenance while underscoring the need for resistance-aware treatment planning and more precise integration of combination approaches.

Indexed as

drug resistancefirst-line maintenancehomologous recombination deficiency (HRD)ovarian cancerPARP inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID42465024
PMCPMC13373545

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.