Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465043›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026

A machine learning approach to identify at-risk populations for yellow fever vaccination.

Madison Farnsworth, Kostiantyn Botnar, Justin T Nguyen, Riley K Watson, Trevor L Murphy, Susan L F McLellan, Kamil Khanipov, George Golovko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Madison FarnsworthDepartment of Human Pathophysiology and Translational Medicine, Institute for Translational Science, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8223-1386
Kostiantyn BotnarDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3583-7576
Justin T NguyenDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Riley K WatsonDepartment of Human Pathophysiology and Translational Medicine, Institute for Translational Science, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, United States.
Trevor L MurphyJohn Sealy School of Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Susan L F McLellanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Kamil KhanipovDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
George GolovkoDepartment of Pharmacology & Toxicology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccinations play a crucial role in public and personal health. Vaccines such as the Yellow Fever 17D vaccine are effective at preventing disease and provide lifelong immunity with few adverse events. Leveraging the increase in electronic medical records and the widespread use of machine learning algorithms in healthcare, this study aims to investigate and develop an algorithmic framework for analyzing clinical data on Yellow Fever 17D vaccinations in order to predict at-risk populations for adverse events following immunizations. This research incorporates parameters from the patient's medical history and demographic information. Methods: To build our analytic framework, we tested five machine learning algorithms: random forest, gradient boost, logistic regression, XGBoost, and Bernoulli naïve Bayes. We cleaned and managed the datasets through EHRchitect software. We assessed the performance of the algorithms using standard metrics, including precision, recall, F1-scores, accuracy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Additionally, we implemented population sampling to mitigate potential biases common in clinical data and performed parameter ranking analysis to identify the most influential features in classifying patient reaction outcomes. Results: We found that logistic regression produced the highest performance, and through hyperparameter optimization, we developed a framework with precision, accuracy, and ROC scores of 87.7%, 99.0%, and 0.818, respectively. Conclusion: In conclusion, this study examined five modeling algorithms to establish a framework for analyzing real-world data and to predict at-risk populations for adverse events following immunization. We incorporated a logistic regression algorithm to assess our clinical data to achieve a high-precision performance model for classifying patient predictions.

Indexed as

Bioinformaticselectronic health recordsinfectious diseasemachine learningvaccine

Identifiers

PMID42465043
PMCPMC13373601

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.