ArticleDigital health
But would you use it again? Determinants of patient intention to reuse and recommend telemental health services: Representative cross-sectional survey from Germany.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To ensure the effectiveness and widespread adoption of telemental health services, continuous use and endorsement by patients must be promoted. Understanding the determinants of patients' reuse and recommendation of these services is critical, but very limited knowledge exists to date. Objective: Identifying determinants of reusing and recommending telemental health services among mental health patients. Methods: Telemental health service users (aged 18-74) who had been receiving mental health services since March 2020 (n=961) were surveyed about their intentions to reuse and recommend the services (0-100% probability scale, continuous variables). A cross-sectional, quota-based (quotas: gender and age group) online survey was conducted in Germany in December 2023. Employing multiple linear regressions, we explored various determinants guided by theoretical models, including socioeconomic, access, health, and psychosocial determinants, as well as patient preferences and provider characteristics. Results: Higher perceived social support (reuse: Conclusion: Fostering social support and positive attitudes towards telemental health services among patients may enhance the continuous use and recommendation of services. Involving and supporting mental health care providers as advocates for telemental health services may further bridge gaps and promote sustained engagement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.