ReviewCureus2026
Clinical Significance of Exposure to Microplastics and the Risk of Diabetes Mellitus in Humans: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microplastics and nanoplastics are pervasive environmental contaminants present in food, water, and air. Many studies have shown bioaccumulation of microplastics in human organs such as the lungs, colon, blood, and even placental tissue. Microplastics are potentially linked to many diseases such as colorectal cancer, lung cancer, obesity, metabolic syndrome, coronary artery disease, and dementia. There is also a potential link between microplastic exposure and diabetes. The incidence of diabetes is rapidly increasing across all countries globally. We conducted this systematic review to study the potential link between microplastic exposure and diabetes or adverse glycemic control in diabetics. A systematic search strategy was used, as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. We searched PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane. A total of 1,239 records were identified, of which 141 duplicates were removed, and 1,098 articles were screened. A total of six studies were included in the results. A meta-analysis could not be conducted as all articles were heterogeneous in exposure to microplastics, methods, etc. Two studies directly measured microplastic levels, one in urine samples of pregnant patients and another in blood serum. Both studies found a statistical significance of higher microplastic levels and worsening of diabetes control. Two studies assessed exposure by proxy-based methods and questionnaires. Participants consisted of people who consumed food in heated plastics and plastic bottled water. These studies found a correlation of higher HbA1c and increased risk of diabetes mellitus, with one study explicitly mentioning increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Two ecological studies where microplastic exposure was obtained from environmental data showed a higher prevalence of diabetes in populations where exposure was higher. While our data indicate an association between microplastic exposure and diabetes, the absence of large, prospective cohort studies currently precludes the establishment of a causal relationship. As plastic pollution accelerates globally, addressing this critical knowledge gap through rigorous longitudinal research is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.