Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465369›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

On the state of chromatin in mammalian sperm.

Katerina Tsimaratou, Victor G Corces

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Katerina TsimaratouDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322.
Victor G CorcesDepartment of Human Genetics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322.ORCID 0000-0001-5140-4337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammalian sperm chromatin carries epigenetic information with the potential to influence offspring phenotype, making its faithful characterization essential. It has been suggested that cauda sperm preparations are contaminated by somatic chromatin, that this contamination dominates genome-wide profiles, and that valid results require pretreatment with somatic cell lysis buffer, DNase I, and dithiothreitol. Here we show that properly purified cauda sperm contain no detectable somatic cells or cell-free DNA and that this pretreatment disrupts sperm chromatin organization. SCLB permeabilizes the sperm nucleus, allowing DNase I to fragment the sperm genome in situ, while DTT treatment causes chromatin to leak out of the nucleus. Using ATAC-see, we further demonstrate that Tn5 transposase can access intact protamine-condensed sperm chromatin without DTT, refuting the premise that profiles from untreated sperm reflect contamination. Pretreatment therefore damages the chromatin it claims to purify, and published profiles of untreated cauda sperm are valid and require no systematic re-examination.

Indexed as

CohesinCTCFDevelopmentFertilizationTranscription

Identifiers

PMID42465369
PMCPMC13370952

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.