Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42465433›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026

Kernelized approach enables explainable gene prioritizations for complex traits.

Taotao Tan, Md Abul Hassan Samee

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Taotao TanDepartment of Integrative Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4904-8059
Md Abul Hassan SameeDepartment of Integrative Physiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

Cytoskeletal Control of Yap in Heart RegenerationR01HL169511 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI James F Martin · 2023 to 2026
$2.7M
Broadly applicable high throughput variant interpretation and validation for MYH7R01HL175964 · NHLBI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI JONATHAN A KIRK, Md. Abul Hassan Samee · 2024 to 2026
$2.1M
Modeling and targeting intrinsic and extrinsic features of Myc-driven OsteosarcomaR01CA288967 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Jason Yustein · 2025 to 2026
$877k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA288967NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL169511NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL175964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous variant-trait associations; yet, assigning effector genes to GWAS loci remains challenging. Similarity-based machine-learning methods, such as PoPS, prioritize effector genes from shared functional profiles among trait-relevant genes. These models assign a prioritization score for each gene and nominate a single effector gene within a GWAS locus. However, the scores provide limited insight into why a gene was prioritized or whether the nomination is biologically plausible. To address this gap, we introduce Kernelized Polygenic Priority Score, K-PoPS, a kernelized reformulation of PoPS that enables gene-centric explanations by decomposing each prediction into contributions from training genes. For each prioritized gene, K-PoPS reports top contributor genes and an anchor score that quantifies support from a user-defined set of trait-relevant genes. Across 38 Pan-UK Biobank traits, the full-feature OLS implementation underlying K-PoPS improved closest-gene enrichment relative to default PoPS for 26 of 37 evaluable traits. Across 25 traits with curated anchor sets, predictions supported by anchor scores were more enriched for closest-gene proxies than unsupported predictions. When applying to blood level apolipoprotein B, K-PoPS nominated

Identifiers

PMID42465433
PMCPMC13370342

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.