ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2026
Kernelized approach enables explainable gene prioritizations for complex traits.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified numerous variant-trait associations; yet, assigning effector genes to GWAS loci remains challenging. Similarity-based machine-learning methods, such as PoPS, prioritize effector genes from shared functional profiles among trait-relevant genes. These models assign a prioritization score for each gene and nominate a single effector gene within a GWAS locus. However, the scores provide limited insight into why a gene was prioritized or whether the nomination is biologically plausible. To address this gap, we introduce Kernelized Polygenic Priority Score, K-PoPS, a kernelized reformulation of PoPS that enables gene-centric explanations by decomposing each prediction into contributions from training genes. For each prioritized gene, K-PoPS reports top contributor genes and an anchor score that quantifies support from a user-defined set of trait-relevant genes. Across 38 Pan-UK Biobank traits, the full-feature OLS implementation underlying K-PoPS improved closest-gene enrichment relative to default PoPS for 26 of 37 evaluable traits. Across 25 traits with curated anchor sets, predictions supported by anchor scores were more enriched for closest-gene proxies than unsupported predictions. When applying to blood level apolipoprotein B, K-PoPS nominated
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.