ReviewFrontiers in oncology2026
Integrating chemokine signatures and multi-omic biomarkers to predict immunotherapy response in non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape, only 20-30% of unselected patients achieve durable clinical benefits. Given the imperfect predictive value of traditional markers, such as PD-L1 expression and tumor mutational burden, there is an urgent need for multidimensional biomarkers to guide personalized immunotherapy. This review evaluates emerging predictive tools, with a specific focus on chemokine signatures and multi-omic (genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic) biomarkers, including integrative models. By examining the biological rationale linking tumor microenvironment chemokine networks to antitumor immunity, we discuss recent advances in profiling that enable comprehensive predictive signatures. A comprehensive narrative literature search of PubMed and EMBASE (2015-2026) was performed to identify relevant peer-reviewed studies, clinical trials, and computational analyses. Evidence suggests that integrating chemokine profiles with multi-omic data holds significant promise for improving patient selection. Multidimensional models incorporating tumor genomics and immune microenvironment features are likely to outperform single-analyte tests in identifying ICI responders. Despite ongoing challenges, such as tumor heterogeneity, assay standardization, and data integration complexity, the development of liquid biopsies and advanced machine learning models offers a path toward robust, clinically applicable predictive nomograms, which are expected to refine immunotherapy decision-making and significantly improve clinical outcomes for patients with NSCLC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.