Evidence mapPaperPMID 42465657Full record

ArticleConsortium psychiatricum2026

Digital and Cyber Psychiatry: Patient Transformation in the Digital Age.

Nikolay Neznanov, Natalia Semenova, Andrey Goncharenko

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Consortium psychiatricum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The total digital transformation has confronted psychiatry with a unique challenge: the human-made information environment has simultaneously become a source of new psychopathology and a tool for overcoming it. In this article, the authors propose examining the dialectic of two fields: cyber psychiatry (which studies the pathogenic influence of the digital world) and digital psychiatry (which develops assistive technologies). Particular attention is paid to the key risk of the current stage - reification, i.e., the substitution of live clinical thinking with the illusory objectivity of algorithms. The discussion addresses why the absence of operational management and clear rules of responsibility when using artificial intelligence in psychiatry creates a "hole" in the professional future. The authors substantiate the thesis that the only reasonable way forward is a hybrid model of care, in which digital tools serve as an extension of the physician's capabilities, not a replacement, and the "human in the loop" possesses real, rather than declarative, authority.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecyber psychiatrydigital psychiatryhybrid modelsoperational managementreification

Identifiers

PMID42465657
PMCPMC13375215

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.