ArticleConsortium psychiatricum2026
Digital and Cyber Psychiatry: Patient Transformation in the Digital Age.
Article in Consortium psychiatricum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The total digital transformation has confronted psychiatry with a unique challenge: the human-made information environment has simultaneously become a source of new psychopathology and a tool for overcoming it. In this article, the authors propose examining the dialectic of two fields: cyber psychiatry (which studies the pathogenic influence of the digital world) and digital psychiatry (which develops assistive technologies). Particular attention is paid to the key risk of the current stage - reification, i.e., the substitution of live clinical thinking with the illusory objectivity of algorithms. The discussion addresses why the absence of operational management and clear rules of responsibility when using artificial intelligence in psychiatry creates a "hole" in the professional future. The authors substantiate the thesis that the only reasonable way forward is a hybrid model of care, in which digital tools serve as an extension of the physician's capabilities, not a replacement, and the "human in the loop" possesses real, rather than declarative, authority.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.