ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026
A rabbit is not a mouse: a framework for the initial welfare assessment and long-term monitoring of genetically altered laboratory rabbits.
Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetically altered (GA) rabbits are used in biomedical research due to their unique physiological and translational relevance. Despite their importance in multiple biomedical research specialties, species-specific guidance for their welfare assessment is limited. This article proposes a comprehensive framework for the initial and long-term welfare evaluation of GA rabbits, covering all life stages from birth to aging. Key indicators and biomarkers include neonatal viability, maternal care, post-weaning growth, sexual maturation, reproductive performance, and late-onset phenotypes, alongside clinical, behavioral, and physiological markers. Emphasis is placed on recording evidence to contextualize observed deviations from wild-type baselines. Accurate monitoring of phases-specific biological biomarkers enables further detection of relevant phenotypes, beyond initial welfare assessment. This framework offers practical guidance for researchers, veterinarians, animal welfare officers and competent authorities, promoting not only non-maleficence but also positive welfare approaches. Implementing a species- and model-specific frame facilitates responsible management of GA rabbits, ensuring ethical integrity, scientific rigor, and the development of positive animal welfare strategies throughout their lifespan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.